Original presentation concept of Merigar East, with the gompa and dance mandalas in front and the planned houses behind the camping area

Technical concept · July 2026 · Preliminary phase

One day, this place will become paradise.

A self-sustaining energy complex for year-round living at Merigar East.

Original presentation concept · not a final design

01 / The foundation

Why energy is the foundation

We are not building a power plant; we are building a chain of life. An isolated site lives year round only if energy powers the water, the comfort and the people who care for it. Break one link and the place falls empty between seasons.

Excellent sun and observed winter wind could cover each other’s weak season. Solar is supported by resource data; wind must be validated by a survey mast.

01

Energy

Sun, wind and battery

02

Water

Well pumping and irrigation

03

Greenery

Trees, gardens, fruit and herbs

04

Comfort

Warm, liveable homes all year

05

Care

People present to tend the place

Satellite view of the actual Merigar East plot, with the central building and three circular dance mandalas visible 43.9° N · coastal Dobruja

02 / The place

The site and the engineering task

Near the village of 23 August in Constanța County, the roughly 3–4 hectare site already holds a gompa, a dormitory and a well. The proposal adds nine dwelling modules behind the gompa, beyond the camping site, a fruit and herb drying facility and an EV charger. The task is to size a hybrid system that covers the winter load of an isolated site under environmental constraints on wind installations.

Existing
Gompa · dormitory for 12 · well
Planned
9 homes · drying facility · EV charging
Mode
Year-round · off-grid or weak-grid

Design constraint: the site lies within the Via Pontica migratory corridor and Natura 2000 context, so wind infrastructure must follow environmental consultation—not lead it.

03 / Demand

The load, built bottom up

Prospective daily consumption for the site’s planned operating mode. These figures are model assumptions, not measured use.

SeasonDwellings ×9DormitoryGompaPump · 3 kWEV + commonTotal
Winter611416123115 kWh/day
Shoulder398652583 kWh/day
Summer2561122872 kWh/day

≈32.8 MWh annual base load. Heat pumps carry the base heating load, while wood covers peak cold and lowers the electrical winter peak.

Still to validate: coincidence analysis for peak kW, inverter and battery sizing; real heat pump profiles; and confirmed well parameters.

04 / Resources

What is known.
What needs measuring.

Solar resource

1,300–1,400

kWh/kWp per year

The presentation identifies coastal Dobruja as one of Romania’s strongest solar regions for fixed-tilt, ground-mounted panels.

Design input: obtain PVGIS data for the exact coordinates at the design stage.

Wind observation

≈5.5 m/s

at 10 m · not yet validated

Estimated power density: ≈195 W/m² at Weibull k=2. The deck cites a good Global Wind Atlas resource at 50–100 m, above the constrained mast height.

Decision gate: a 12-month anemometric survey before any investment decision.

05 / Seasonal balance

Monthly balance: solar and wind

The core idea is seasonal complementarity: coastal Dobruja’s strong solar resource peaks in summer, while observed wind appears strongest from November to March. The wind assumption still needs a full year of measurement.

32.8MWh annual base load
115kWh/day winter demand
92–95%target energy autonomy
2.8×generation-to-load ratio

Monthly balance · kWh

50 kWp solar + 10 kW wind

Generation bars combine 50 kWp of solar with a provisional 10 kW wind system. The white marker shows monthly load, not generation.

SolarWindLoad

Solar supplies 76% of modeled annual generation; wind supplies 24%, concentrated in the solar winter minimum.

December check: 1,350 kWh solar + 2,988 kWh wind against 3,571 kWh load = 1.21× modeled coverage. A cloudy, windless multi-day spell still starts the generator.

06 / Configuration

Proposed configuration

Full capacity remains subject to “Phase 0” validation. Each element has a clear role and a fallback.

Solar

50 kWp

Ground-mounted in the southern meadow; vertical bifacial fencing remains an option for the winter profile.

Wind

10 kW

A horizontal-axis turbine only after a 12-month survey and environmental approval. The concept remains viable without it.

Storage

≈150 kWh

LFP battery sized for roughly 1–1.5 days of winter autonomy, with final chemistry and C-rate to be validated.

Heat

Hybrid

Heat pumps carry the base demand; wood or pellets cover peak cold and reduce the electrical winter peak.

Backup

≈20 kVA

Emergency generator support, targeting less than 5% of annual energy rather than an unrealistic promise of total autonomy.

Networks

≈710 m

Low-voltage power and water distribution below frost depth to homes, common spaces and productive gardens.

The configuration lists approximately 710 m of network runs; the budget allows 850 m of trenches. These different quantities need reconciliation during detailed design. Annual generation is approximately 2.8 times the base load, allowing for off-grid operation, cloudy periods and production activity.

07 / Budget · July 2026

Budget by consolidated parts

Indicative prices from the July 2026 bill of quantities. These are preliminary estimates, subject to design, surveys and permits.

01Energy system50 kWp PV, inverters, 150 kWh battery, 10 kW wind, survey mast, generator and EMS€151,100
02On-site networks850 m trenches, low-voltage cables, water, sewage, 35-person-equivalent treatment plant and lighting€70,760
03Dwelling modules9 turnkey modules with winter insulation, including foundations€289,800
04ProductionFruit and herb drying lines, fully equipped€30,100
05General infrastructureWell, irrigation, paths, EV charger, common kitchen and fencing€64,000
06Design & permitsLicensed design, environmental procedures and supervision€45,000
Parts 1–6€650,760
Contingency · 12% (rounded)€78,090
Total project value≈ €729,000

08 / Constraints

Constraints and main risks

01

Wind may be refused

Consult APM Constanța before committing to a horizontal-axis mast. A smaller vertical-axis system—or no wind—is the fallback.

02

5.5 m/s is an observation

Wind power scales with the cube of speed: 4.8 instead of 5.5 m/s cuts expected yield by about 35%. A 12-month anemometric survey is required before investment.

03

Storage is not infinite

A 150 kWh battery cannot bridge every 3–5 day cloudy and windless winter spell. Backup remains part of resilience.

04

Fallback without wind

More solar, a larger battery, wood combined heat and power to be assessed, and more generator hours. The presentation anticipates covering winter demand at a higher cost.

09 / Engineering review

Open engineering questions

The energy model, drying-facility business plan and legal due-diligence checklist are available as working materials.

Start a technical conversation
  1. 01

    Coincidence analysis and peak kW for the inverter fleet and battery C-rate.

  2. 02

    AC or DC coupling for 50 kWp solar, wind and 150 kWh storage, and the choice of energy management system (EMS).

  3. 03

    Ground-source versus air-source heat pumps: real coefficient of performance (COP) under the site’s winter profile.

  4. 04

    A bankable survey mast: measurement heights, sensors and standard.

  5. 05

    Lightning protection and earthing for isolated metal modular dwellings.

  6. 06

    A maintenance strategy that separates local service from contracted expertise.

A living mandala, shaped by many hands

The project is technical. The purpose is human.

Merigar East has grown through practice, volunteer work and shared care. This vision asks energy to serve that continuity: quietly, responsibly and for the long term.